So, according to
"Oldest
fossil 'rabbit' unearthed," finding a fossil rabbit 20
million years earlier than any previous rabbit "adds
weight to the idea that rabbit-like creatures first evolved no earlier
than 65 million years ago." I find this fascinating. If that confirms
the theory, what would manage to call the theory into question (without
actually constituting a contradiction of the theory)? Would anything?
This is a prime example of why I do not like evolution.
If something doesn't happen, that proves it wasn't designed. If
something does, it proves it did evolve. \
