Two bits of science news today. "Classic maths puzzle cracked at last" talks about patterns in numbers. Mathematicians were apparently surprised as they discovered how prevalent these are, but I am not. It is the same sort of argument that is being made when you look at the finite ranges in which life as we know it could exist.
The other is "">Startling Scientists, Plant Fixes Its Flawed Gene," which suggests there may be more to heredity than Mendel's laws and DNA. If so, this would raise the explanatory bar for evolution significantly higher, as a mutation must get past this extra set of non-DNA based accuracy checks. Why have we not noticed this before? Perhaps because it was not looked for?