There is just one thing about "Defense: England Oxygen-Deprived at Birth" that I want to comment on. It mentions "a psychologist testifying that the reservist was oxygen-deprived at birth, speech impaired and had trouble learning to read." A psychologist is testifying on this‽ His area of expertise is what now‽ Reading further, perhaps he is simply testifying to the fact that he has been aware of this diagnosis for years. Either way, it is evidence of the disturbing trend to question the priest but trust the psychologist. I fail to grasp what the material difference is, except, of course, that you have had a chance to know what sort of person the priest is from his homilies, but you know nothing about the psychologist except possibly a recommendation.
