"Killer dino 'turned vegetarian'" is interesting primarily because it exposes the preconceptions of the materialist scientist. He does not know what this beast eats, he does not know where it came from, or what it gave birth to. Yet he is utterly confident of his evolutionary explanation. What this does not mention, what I would find interesting is how they think this beast relates in time and evolution to the Tyrannosaurus Rex. Oh, and this mentions the frequency of mass "graves" of dinosaur. Naturally this could not have anything to do with a flood.
