So apparently,[1] "household" means a married family still in Florida. Normally that would please me, but this is just bizarre. How is that a marriage license is required to limit payments from an insurance company, when we are seeking to have benefits extend to those that are merely living together in a so called "committed relationship?" I worry that this will be used by homosexual "rights" activists to further the push for homosexual "marriages." That being said, the other two judges are exactly right: if you are not related by blood, adoption, or marriage, you cannot really be part of the same household. I am all for extended families, but including a live-in boyfriend as part of the family is further than I would be willing to go.
[1] http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1118307913363